www.navalism.org

Main Archive => Navalism 3 Armed Forces => Armed Forces => New Ship Designs => Topic started by: ledeper on February 07, 2010, 10:33:35 AM

Title: Treaty BC,first attempt
Post by: ledeper on February 07, 2010, 10:33:35 AM
Hannover Esc Panzer-shiffe laid down 1919 (Engine 1916)

Displacement:
   28.000 t light; 29.287 t standard; 31.855 t normal; 33.909 t full load

Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught
   764,92 ft / 761,15 ft x 104,99 ft x 30,35 ft (normal load)
   233,15 m / 232,00 m x 32,00 m  x 9,25 m

Armament:
      6 - 14,96" / 380 mm guns (2x3 guns), 1.674,25lbs / 759,43kg shells, 1919 Model
     Breech loading guns in turrets (on barbettes)
     on centreline ends, evenly spread
      8 - 4,92" / 125 mm guns (4x2 guns), 59,59lbs / 27,03kg shells, 1919 Model
     Quick firing guns in deck mounts
     on side, all amidships
      4 - 1,57" / 40,0 mm guns in single mounts, 1,95lbs / 0,88kg shells, 1919 Model
     Anti-aircraft guns in deck mounts
     on side, evenly spread, all raised mounts
   Weight of broadside 10.530 lbs / 4.776 kg
   Shells per gun, main battery: 110

Armour:
   - Belts:      Width (max)   Length (avg)      Height (avg)
   Main:   11,8" / 300 mm   492,13 ft / 150,00 m   14,76 ft / 4,50 m
   Ends:   Unarmoured
   Upper:   3,94" / 100 mm   492,13 ft / 150,00 m   8,01 ft / 2,44 m
     Main Belt covers 99 % of normal length

   - Torpedo Bulkhead:
      1,57" / 40 mm   492,13 ft / 150,00 m   26,48 ft / 8,07 m

   - Gun armour:   Face (max)   Other gunhouse (avg)   Barbette/hoist (max)
   Main:   13,8" / 350 mm   7,87" / 200 mm      11,8" / 300 mm
   2nd:   1,97" / 50 mm   0,79" / 20 mm            -

   - Armour deck: 2,95" / 75 mm, Conning tower: 7,87" / 200 mm

Machinery:
   Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
   Electric cruising motors plus geared drives, 4 shafts, 124.014 shp / 92.515 Kw = 30,00 kts
   Range 9.000nm at 14,00 kts
   Bunker at max displacement = 4.622 tons

Complement:
   1.191 - 1.549

Cost:
   £5,962 million / $23,848 million

Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
   Armament: 1.316 tons, 4,1 %
   Armour: 9.500 tons, 29,8 %
      - Belts: 4.334 tons, 13,6 %
      - Torpedo bulkhead: 759 tons, 2,4 %
      - Armament: 1.429 tons, 4,5 %
      - Armour Deck: 2.807 tons, 8,8 %
      - Conning Tower: 170 tons, 0,5 %
   Machinery: 4.621 tons, 14,5 %
   Hull, fittings & equipment: 12.114 tons, 38,0 %
   Fuel, ammunition & stores: 3.855 tons, 12,1 %
   Miscellaneous weights: 450 tons, 1,4 %

Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
   Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
     37.610 lbs / 17.059 Kg = 22,5 x 15,0 " / 380 mm shells or 6,0 torpedoes
   Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1,16
   Metacentric height 7,1 ft / 2,2 m
   Roll period: 16,5 seconds
   Steadiness   - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 70 %
         - Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0,29
   Seaboat quality  (Average = 1.00): 1,00

Hull form characteristics:
   Hull has a flush deck
   Block coefficient: 0,460
   Length to Beam Ratio: 7,25 : 1
   'Natural speed' for length: 27,59 kts
   Power going to wave formation at top speed: 50 %
   Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 70
   Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 10,00 degrees
   Stern overhang: 0,00 ft / 0,00 m
   Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length):
      - Stem:      21,33 ft / 6,50 m
      - Forecastle (10 %):   16,40 ft / 5,00 m
      - Mid (50 %):      16,40 ft / 5,00 m
      - Quarterdeck (15 %):   16,40 ft / 5,00 m
      - Stern:      16,40 ft / 5,00 m
      - Average freeboard:   16,60 ft / 5,06 m
   Ship tends to be wet forward

Ship space, strength and comments:
   Space   - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 99,1 %
      - Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 134,8 %
   Waterplane Area: 51.387 Square feet or 4.774 Square metres
   Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 107 %
   Structure weight / hull surface area: 178 lbs/sq ft or 868 Kg/sq metre
   Hull strength (Relative):
      - Cross-sectional: 1,00
      - Longitudinal: 1,06
      - Overall: 1,00
   Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is adequate
   Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent
   Ship has slow, easy roll, a good, steady gun platform

Title: Re: Treaty BC,first attempt
Post by: Carthaginian on February 07, 2010, 10:36:05 AM
The CSA has been looking at something similar, but with a main battery that works with in the treaty (13.5" guns).
This vessel's 15" guns are one size class outside Treaty limitations.

All in all, it's a nicely balanced ship- and might I might add, lacks the 'short belt' problems of many earlier ships that the ESC has put to sea! An excellent design, should the main battery be reduced... and proof that ships of excellent quality and fighting potential can be laid down under the Treaty terms.
Title: Re: Treaty BC,first attempt
Post by: ledeper on February 07, 2010, 10:45:15 AM
Gun size is quite difficult for the Esc since Esc only 12" 40/50 cal and the 14" /45 and 15/45 and 50 16" 45 and building 18"45guns ,one of the main reasons for Esc not to adhere to "Richmond",at least for the time being
Title: Re: Treaty BC,first attempt
Post by: Carthaginian on February 07, 2010, 10:48:13 AM
Well, how do you think the CSA feels- our 13.5" guns are a generation old, and our 15" guns are behind the larger guns that others are developing. Still, the caliber limitations are something we support- even though it means that we'd have to invest in a lot of new BB gun research.

And don't REMIND me that my primary heavy cruiser gun is the 9.2"!
Like England, that will likely come back to haunt me later on.

So the treaty is difficult for the CSA as well- in fact, I deliberately constructed it that way.
It gives us all a chance to try something new. :)
Title: Re: Treaty BC,first attempt
Post by: Tanthalas on February 07, 2010, 11:57:00 AM
Rohan is fairly well set on the guns with 12/50, 14/50 15.5/45 and 15.5/50 that said Treaty BCs will end up looking quite a bit like the former NS I class BCs.
Title: Re: Treaty BC,first attempt
Post by: Guinness on February 07, 2010, 12:15:12 PM
Quote from: Carthaginian on February 07, 2010, 10:48:13 AM
And don't REMIND me that my primary heavy cruiser gun is the 9.2"!
Like England, that will likely come back to haunt me later on.

Ouch...
Title: Re: Treaty BC,first attempt
Post by: The Rock Doctor on February 07, 2010, 01:44:09 PM
That's one area I don't have a lot of trouble in - 194mm, 234mm, 275mm, 305mm, 350mm, 380mm, and 400mm under development.
Title: Re: Treaty BC,first attempt
Post by: Sachmle on February 07, 2010, 02:42:07 PM
194 (why I have no idea..why not 190/195/200), 210 (under development), 240, 280, 305, 350, 380.

And on the other end: 37, 50, 88, 105, 120, 130, 150. Wonder if I should do something between 150 and 194? What would it be, a 170 like Bavaria or maybe a 165 like France? Hmm...
Title: Re: Treaty BC,first attempt
Post by: Guinness on February 07, 2010, 02:43:58 PM
Quote from: Sachmle on February 07, 2010, 02:42:07 PM
194 (why I have no idea..why not 190/195/200)

Probably because there was an historical caliber there (in this case French)
Title: Re: Treaty BC,first attempt
Post by: Sachmle on February 07, 2010, 02:45:05 PM
Oh, I'm aware of the OTL French 7.6" guns. Just not sure why Swampy/BR choose that size for DKB.
Title: Re: Treaty BC,first attempt
Post by: The Rock Doctor on February 07, 2010, 03:34:34 PM
DKB bought two old Colombian ACs with 194mm guns during 2PW, and started new guns for them - but the Swiss sank them long before they ever finished.
Title: Re: Treaty BC,first attempt
Post by: Sachmle on February 07, 2010, 03:38:22 PM
Quote from: The Rock Doctor on February 07, 2010, 03:34:34 PM
DKB bought two old Colombian ACs with 194mm guns during 2PW, and started new guns for them - but the Swiss sank them long before they ever finished.

My what a small world. DKB buys ex-Columbian ACs and develops new guns to replace old ones..then sells license for said guns to...Colombians. That's just funny IMHO.
Title: Re: Treaty BC,first attempt
Post by: Desertfox on February 09, 2010, 07:10:51 AM
You forgot something, you bought the ships from the Swiss who then proceeded to sink them...