Byzantine Empire 1919H2

[Jefgte]

Here is 1919H2 Byzantine Empire Report

3 new IC for Colonies.
Artillery Technos :
T2x102 available.
T2x120 available.
T2x152 available.
T3x254 available.
T3x191 complete.
1 new national land point.
1 new air point.

Shipyards news :
Continue :
Battleships Hartegos, Heraclius, Imperator, Imbraturia (30600t)
Sea Plane Transport Antalya & Adana (5550t)

Laid down :
Sea Plane Transport Azgar & Assiout (5550t)
MTBD237 to MTBD248 (40t)
MNSW45 to MNSW48 (150t)

Finish => Trials :
D121 to D124 (1140t)
MTBD229 to MTBD236 (40t)
SS49 to SS52 (750t)

[Kaiser Kirk]

I had not noticed that your new DDs are 1140 tons...and mine are 1143 tons.
That is quite odd.

[Kaiser Kirk]

Jefgte,

There seems to be an error on your turn.
You did not increase your Colonial IC to account for all the ones completed in HY1 1919.

At the beginning of HY1 1919, you had 45 colonial IC
You completed 9 in HY1 1919.

At the beginning of HY2 1919 you should have 54 colonial IC.
You show 48
you then complete 3 more.

For the 'Colony Count' I will show you as having completed 54+3 = 57.

[Jefgte]

I had not noticed that your new DDs are 1140 tons...and mine are 1143 tons.

They are not new, the first 1140t were LD in 1916.
This class includes 16 ships.

[Jefgte]

For the 'Colony Count' I will show you as having completed 54+3 = 57.

I have already calculated my table twice

1919H2	1919H1	1918H2	1918H1	1917H2	1917H1	1916H2	1916H1	1915H2	1915H1	1914H2	1914H1	1913H2	1913H1	1912H2	1912H1	1911H2	1911H1
48	45	38	34	29	26	23	20	18	8	7	6	5	1	1	0	0	0

-------------

There is a small error on Egypt, I have $ 3 more.
(investment 28 while 25 are sufficient)

[Kaiser Kirk]

I am simply going by the numbers, not your table.

Your 1919.0 report the number of "Developed Provinces with IC"  SUM(C15:E39) = 45
'Colonial Regions IC Construction' lists completions in :
Madagascar North
Madagascar West
Maputo
Luderitz
Porto Seguro
Saloman Islands
Bioela
Boulia
Manokwi

That is 9 completed IC.

Therefore on your "Developed Provinces with IC" 1919.5report, the number of "Developed Provinces with IC"  should be the 45 from 1919.0 + 9 completed in 1919.0 = 54.

Instead  "Developed Provinces with IC" '=SUM(C15:E39)' = 47.   
I note that in cell H39 you have '48' as a total for 'Control Ok'.  but that is because you have '3' in H36 Gladstone when you only have 2 IC listed.

So, you seem  to be not counting all the IC you have built.

Then in 1919.5 you complete IC in
Madagascar Interior
Piaui
Sunda Islands

Which means for the purpose of the Beginning HY 1 1920 Colony count, I will be considering Byzantine to have 54+3 = 57 IC.

[Jefgte]

I note that in cell H39 you have '48' as a total for 'Control Ok'.  but that is because you have '3' in H36 Gladstone when you only have 2 IC listed.

That's probably because I add Biloela, left of Gladstone.

Your 1919.0 report the number of "Developed Provinces with IC"  SUM(C15:E39) = 45
'Colonial Regions IC Construction' lists completions in :
Madagascar North
Madagascar West
Maputo
Luderitz
Porto Seguro
Saloman Islands
Bioela
Boulia
Manokwi

That is 9 completed IC.

Madagascar North=>average +1.5$
Madagascar West => average +1.5$
Maputo => average +1.5$
Luderitz => average +1.5$
Porto Seguro => prime +3$
Saloman Islands => average +1.5$
Bioela => prime +3$
Boulia => poor +0.75$
Manokwi => average +1.5$

total =====> Add +15.75$ + 9 IC for 1919H1
========> Add +15.75$ + 9 IC for 1919H2
Madagascar Interior => prime +3$
Piaui => prime +3$
Sunda Islands => average +1.5$
total =====> Add+7.5$ + 3 IC for 1919H2

Add on 1919H2 report:
15.75$ (H1)+ 15.75$(H2) +7.5$(H2) = 39$
+9IC

You fucked up Jef  >:(

[Kaiser Kirk]

It is not that bad.

You completed the 9 in HY 1, 1919.
So they did not produce $ until HY2, 1919.

Plus, you did credit yourself with 45 IC in 1919.0 and 47 IC in 1919.5,
so you did count 2 of them, and skip 7.
So that's 1 HY at 7 x average 1.5= $ 10.5

Not nearly as bad as you thought.

Since Each Expansion, I update the Colony Count, looking at the Colonial IC + IC completed,
I have an idea of what the next Colonial IC number should be.
When yours did not match up, I did a little more examination.
So I think it is just this one turn - HY 1919.5 - that is the problem.

Good to catch it now before you move onto HY1 1920.

[Jefgte]

You completed the 9 in HY 1, 1919.
So they did not produce $ until HY2, 1919.

We do not count the same.
Complete and usable 1HY later (idem for the technos)

=> 7BP complete in 1919H1 not 9
=> 7BP available in 1919H2
Error on Luderitz & Porto Seguro

[Kaiser Kirk]

I may not understand something.

Here is your colonial development in 1919.0.
The provinces you did not invest in are not shown.

The count is 9 completed in 1919.0
These do not produce revenue in 1919.0, these should start producing revenue in 1919.5

Your 1919 colonial IC was summed at 45
Your 1919.5 colonial IC was summed at 47

That is only an increase of 2, not 9. 

The difference between the two is 7.
The $1.5 average * 7 = $10.5 revenue missing from 1919.5.

So, I suppose I could be wrong, I do not see where.

							COMPLETED
	Colonial IC Cost	Prime	Average	Harsh			1919
	Port	5	10	15
	Coastal	10	15	20
	Interior	15	20	25
Harbor		Colonial Regions.
Land		IC Construction		5 max
Colonial	IC Construction	Total Needed		Cash added	Total
Region	Prior investment	(enter from above)	Status	this HY
Madagascar-North(2)	10	15	complete	$5.00	$15.00		1
Madagascar-West(2)	10	15	complete	$5.00	$15.00		1
Madagascar-East(Interior)	0	15	building	$5.00	$5.00
Madagascar-Interior(2)	5	15	building	$5.00	$10.00
Maputo	5	10	complete	$5.00	$10.00		1
Luderitz	15	15	complete	$5.00	$20.00		1
Piaui	5	15	building	$5.00	$10.00
Porto Seguro	5	10	complete	$5.00	$10.00		1
Sunda Islands	5	15	building	$5.00	$10.00
Salomon Islands	5	10	complete	$5.00	$10.00		1
Biloela	10	15	complete	$5.00	$15.00		1
Boulia	10	15	complete	$5.00	$15.00		1
Manokwari	5	10	complete	$5.00	$10.00		1
							9

[Jefgte]

Luderitz & Porto Seguro were complete in1918H2 (15$ each)
5$ in F98 & F106 are error in 1919H1 report => but they are investment...
That I continue. So they are not yet complete.

Complete
+7 IC in 1919H1
+3 IC in 1919H2

Available
+7 IC in 1919H2 => 53 IC
+3 IC in 1920H1 => 56 IC (Luderitz IC in 1920H2)

[Jefgte]

1919H1 report
It's the addition column that messed up in my table :-[
F127 => $ 65 => OK
S121 => $ 55 => not OK

Already Alzheimer Jef ...

[Kaiser Kirk]

it is surprisingly easy to get things mixed up.

If I was to create a new version of the spreadsheet,
I think I would spend extra time to try to add elements to make
the update turn to turn easier.

The current sheets were an improvement over the 1910 version
and seem to have caught all the 1912 changes well.

BUT...As it is, for Parthia's sheets I've got some extra columns
and quality checks because I've had issues.

[Jefgte]

I rework like that:

Complete
+7 IC in 1919H1
+4 IC in 1919H2

Available
+7 IC in 1919H2 => 52 IC (45+7)
+4 IC in 1920H1 => 56 IC (52+4)

[Kaiser Kirk]

Thanks for the work Jefgte :)