Siam/Netherlands

The Rock Doctor · October 11, 2009, 08:40:16 PM

Good catch. I erred with the RRC costs. They should be doubled, and will be momentarily.

TexanCowboy · October 11, 2009, 08:40:51 PM

Logi's gonna kill me for this...

Logi · October 11, 2009, 08:46:37 PM

My troops were 4/2 corps. And thank you for speaking up Texan *glares* ;D

TexanCowboy · October 11, 2009, 08:47:01 PM

So I don't get killed? ;)

Logi · October 11, 2009, 08:47:44 PM

No you do.

I'm just curious but why does it cost less to buy a new corp than repair 30,000 troops?

TexanCowboy · October 11, 2009, 08:48:54 PM

That was actually going to be my next question.

The Rock Doctor · October 11, 2009, 08:54:17 PM

Apparently I fail at math tonight. Yes, logically, costs to replace should be comparable to new costs.

Watch for a second round of edits momentarily.

TexanCowboy · October 11, 2009, 08:55:04 PM

So now Logi won't kill me, he'll only severly maim me. ;)

The Rock Doctor · October 11, 2009, 09:00:49 PM

Logi's numbers are back to what they were originally, so you didn't cost him anything. But, as they say around Christmas, "It's the thought that counts."

The second-edit numbers in that thread should be good for all parties. Hapsburgers, Firanj, and Romania incurred no significant losses.

TexanCowboy · October 11, 2009, 09:01:23 PM

Another edit, the Chinese troops were baseline.

Fianji entered the war?

The Rock Doctor · October 12, 2009, 07:19:45 AM

No, they were not. The two infantry corps taking the brunt of casualties were 5/3 units.

Firanj was in the war very briefly - in diplomatic terms, just long enough to make Emperor Thrawn look quite incompetent.