Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
September 05, 2010, 10:00:45 pm
Home Help Login Register

+  www.navalism.org
|-+  Armed Forces of Navalism
| |-+  General Naval Discussion
| | |-+  OOC Discussion Regarding Richmond Naval Talks
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11 Print
Author Topic: OOC Discussion Regarding Richmond Naval Talks  (Read 1462 times)
ctwaterman
Curia
Hero Member
*
Posts: 1591


Menace from Venice


« Reply #135 on: February 07, 2010, 07:53:21 pm »

Sailing into Phoenix Harbor might be difficult if you wanted to get near say the pier to refuel Huh?

I see your actual design studdy dropped the 18" Inch Gun Design Smiley

Logged

To Err Is Human to Forgive is Devine
Neither is Marine Corp Policy
Desertfox
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3224


Great Lord of Entropy


« Reply #136 on: February 07, 2010, 08:00:05 pm »

Well she would get her own tanker fleet of course...

OOC I can't actually build her, don't have the guns nor the infrastructure, thought IC others might not know that.
Logged

ctwaterman
Curia
Hero Member
*
Posts: 1591


Menace from Venice


« Reply #137 on: February 07, 2010, 08:10:57 pm »

Looks at the long line of Former Swiss Monarchist Officers who are seeking sanctuary oversea.....

Talks to one of them... so the depth of Pearl Harbor is only 40' you say.....
Logged

To Err Is Human to Forgive is Devine
Neither is Marine Corp Policy
Desertfox
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3224


Great Lord of Entropy


« Reply #138 on: February 07, 2010, 08:16:51 pm »

Who said these ships will be based in Pearl harbor? Wink
Logged

Walter
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1832



« Reply #139 on: February 07, 2010, 08:38:03 pm »

I doubt you asked CanisD for permission to use his drawing like I did for Muteki Nippon and his fast Yamato. Smiley
Logged
Desertfox
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3224


Great Lord of Entropy


« Reply #140 on: February 07, 2010, 08:42:50 pm »

It wouldn't be Swiss like to ask for permission...
Logged

Walter
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1832



« Reply #141 on: February 07, 2010, 08:58:02 pm »

If you were a historical person, you'd most likely be Benedict Arnold. Cheesy
Logged
Desertfox
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3224


Great Lord of Entropy


« Reply #142 on: February 07, 2010, 09:05:37 pm »

I think Napoleon Bonapart fits better. Cause while I have been the most chaotic, troublesome, and random person around, I have yet to betray anyone here or in Wesworld. Maybe that's my problem, not enough shooting people in the back... hmm...
« Last Edit: February 07, 2010, 09:13:22 pm by Desertfox » Logged

The Rock Doctor
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6889

Banana Republican


« Reply #143 on: February 07, 2010, 09:09:18 pm »

I think the Colombians have just decided to ignore the Swiss guy in black.  His trouble-making schemes are too blatant.
Logged

No plan survives contact with the Moderator.
Desertfox
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3224


Great Lord of Entropy


« Reply #144 on: February 07, 2010, 09:11:53 pm »


Logged

Walter
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1832



« Reply #145 on: February 07, 2010, 09:14:36 pm »

Looking at that cat made me realize something. You're not Arnold or Napoleon. You're Ming the Merciless!!! Grin
Logged
The Rock Doctor
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6889

Banana Republican


« Reply #146 on: February 20, 2010, 12:17:53 pm »

I distinctly recall that in the IC thread, Romania agreed to the GC suggestion, then DKB gave them the what-for.  Now it's a CSA question, followed by the DKB what-for to Romania.  So how did a Romania post turn into a CSA post?
Logged

No plan survives contact with the Moderator.
Tanthalas
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2210


Dont tread on me


« Reply #147 on: February 20, 2010, 12:49:34 pm »

no idea rock, I musta missed it.
Logged

"He either fears his fate too much,
Or his desserts are small,
Who dares not put it to the touch,
To win or lose it all!"

James Graham, 5th Earl of Montrose
1612 to 1650
Royalist General during the English Civil War
Sachmle
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2706


Two wrongs do make a Reich.


WWW
« Reply #148 on: February 21, 2010, 01:27:13 am »

I distinctly recall that in the IC thread, Romania agreed to the GC suggestion, then DKB gave them the what-for.  Now it's a CSA question, followed by the DKB what-for to Romania.  So how did a Romania post turn into a CSA post?

Best guess Texan deleted his comment. Other than that, IDK.

Also remember, the IC thread is just that. At no time now, nor in the past have I had a personal dislike of TexanCowboy. Only an DKB IC dislike of Rumania, well more a distrust.
Logged

"All treaties between great states cease to be binding when they come in conflict with the struggle for existence."
Otto von Bismarck

"Give me a woman who loves beer and I will conquer the world."
Kaiser Wilhelm

"If stupidity were painfull I would be deaf from all the screaming." Sam A. Grim
Logi
New Lord of Chaos
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1834


Chaos will win because Order is dumb.


« Reply #149 on: February 21, 2010, 05:53:27 am »

OOC: How would you know the exact displacement of a ship in building? Of another country no less.
Logged

../ |
( '  .`7
  l   '' \
 /.J f , )/
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!